koigrid vs Wasabi
S3 storage with bandwidth included and no minimum-retention traps.
Wasabi removed egress fees but added a 1 TB minimum and a 90-day minimum retention — delete early and you still pay. And it’s storage-only, not managed or agent-native.
Same setup — what you actually pay
You save ~$2/mo (29%)
For object storage with real download traffic. Estimate from public pricing; koigrid bills reserved resources by the hour, with egress included. (prices reviewed 2026-07-03)
| Feature | koigrid | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Egress | Included | Free |
| Minimum retention | None | 90 days — billed even if you delete |
| Minimum storage | None | 1 TB minimum billed |
| Agent / API-native | Yes | No |
| Managed + human support | Yes | No (storage only) |
What koigrid improves
No minimums
Pay for what you use — no 1 TB floor, no 90-day lock.
Managed cloud
Not just a bucket: a managed cloud with support, billed by the hour for what you reserve.
Agent-native
Drive it from your AI agent via API.
Frequently asked questions
Is koigrid cheaper than Wasabi?
It depends on the workload. koigrid charges for the RAM and disk you reserve, by the hour, shared vCPU included, from a public price list — with bandwidth included and no per-request fees. Egress-heavy setups usually come out well ahead; see the estimate above.
Can I migrate from Wasabi without lock-in?
Yes. koigrid runs on portable primitives — standard PostgreSQL, S3-compatible storage and containers — so you can move in (or out) whenever you want.
Where is my data hosted?
In data centers in the EU, on servers we run ourselves. The privacy policy says exactly where.
Can I run everything from an API or an AI agent?
Yes — koigrid is API-first and agent-native: every action has an API and a scoped token, with llms.txt and OpenAPI so an LLM can operate it end to end.