Comparison

koigrid vs Atlassian Statuspage

Public status pages — the built-in alternative to Atlassian Statuspage.

Statuspage is the incumbent, but it lives apart from your monitoring: components are updated by hand (or via integrations), and pricing grows with pages and subscribers. koigrid Status Pages are generated straight from the Checks already watching your services, with no per-page fee — so the public page reflects reality without busywork.

FeaturekoigridAtlassian Statuspage
PricingIncluded (no per-use fee)Per page + subscribers
Generated from your monitoringYes (your Checks)No (manual)
Uptime % per componentYes (from check runs)Yes
Lives next to your apps/DBsYes (same platform)No
Manage by API / AI agentNativeAPI

What koigrid improves

Always honest

Generated from real check runs — no forgetting to flip a component to down.

No per-use fee

Included — no per-page or per-subscriber bill.

One platform

Status pages sit next to the checks, apps and databases they report on.

Frequently asked questions

Is koigrid cheaper than Atlassian Statuspage?

It depends on the workload. koigrid charges for the RAM and disk you reserve, by the hour, shared vCPU included, from a public price list — with bandwidth included and no per-request fees. Egress-heavy setups usually come out well ahead; see the estimate above.

Can I migrate from Atlassian Statuspage without lock-in?

Yes. koigrid runs on portable primitives — standard PostgreSQL, S3-compatible storage and containers — so you can move in (or out) whenever you want.

Where is my data hosted?

In data centers in the EU, on servers we run ourselves. The privacy policy says exactly where.

Can I run everything from an API or an AI agent?

Yes — koigrid is API-first and agent-native: every action has an API and a scoped token, with llms.txt and OpenAPI so an LLM can operate it end to end.