koigrid vs Sentry
Error tracking — the built-in alternative to Sentry.
Sentry is the gold standard for error tracking, with deep features and per-event pricing. koigrid gives you the essentials — capture, group by fingerprint, count, resolve — with no per-event fee and right next to the apps the errors come from, all drivable by an AI agent.
| Feature | koigrid | Sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Included (no per-use fee) | Per event / tier |
| Group by fingerprint + counts | Yes | Yes |
| Resolve / reopen | Yes | Yes |
| Source maps / releases | Roadmap | Yes |
| Next to your apps/DBs | Yes (same platform) | No |
| Manage by AI agent | Native | API |
What koigrid improves
One platform
Errors sit next to the apps, checks and logs they come from.
No per-use fee
Included — no per-event bill that spikes on incident day.
Agent-native
Triage and resolve errors from your LLM via the API.
Frequently asked questions
Is koigrid cheaper than Sentry?
It depends on the workload. koigrid charges for the RAM and disk you reserve, by the hour, shared vCPU included, from a public price list — with bandwidth included and no per-request fees. Egress-heavy setups usually come out well ahead; see the estimate above.
Can I migrate from Sentry without lock-in?
Yes. koigrid runs on portable primitives — standard PostgreSQL, S3-compatible storage and containers — so you can move in (or out) whenever you want.
Where is my data hosted?
In data centers in the EU, on servers we run ourselves. The privacy policy says exactly where.
Can I run everything from an API or an AI agent?
Yes — koigrid is API-first and agent-native: every action has an API and a scoped token, with llms.txt and OpenAPI so an LLM can operate it end to end.