koigrid vs LaunchDarkly
Feature flags & gradual rollout — the built-in alternative to LaunchDarkly.
LaunchDarkly leads feature management, but it charges per seat and per monthly active user and lives apart from your infrastructure. koigrid Feature Flags give you instant toggles and stable, per-user gradual rollout with no per-seat or per-MAU fee, right next to the apps they gate — and every operation is one API call your AI agent can make.
| Feature | koigrid | LaunchDarkly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Included (no per-use fee) | Per seat + per MAU |
| On/off toggle | Yes | Yes |
| Gradual % rollout (stable per user) | Yes | Yes |
| Lives next to your apps/DBs | Yes (same platform) | No |
| Evaluate by API / AI agent | Native | SDK |
| Attribute targeting | Yes | Yes |
What koigrid improves
No per-use fee
Included — no bill that grows with your active users or seats.
One platform
Flags live beside the apps, databases and caches they gate.
Agent-native
Create, toggle and roll out flags from your LLM via the API.
Frequently asked questions
Is koigrid cheaper than LaunchDarkly?
It depends on the workload. koigrid charges for the RAM and disk you reserve, by the hour, shared vCPU included, from a public price list — with bandwidth included and no per-request fees. Egress-heavy setups usually come out well ahead; see the estimate above.
Can I migrate from LaunchDarkly without lock-in?
Yes. koigrid runs on portable primitives — standard PostgreSQL, S3-compatible storage and containers — so you can move in (or out) whenever you want.
Where is my data hosted?
In data centers in the EU, on servers we run ourselves. The privacy policy says exactly where.
Can I run everything from an API or an AI agent?
Yes — koigrid is API-first and agent-native: every action has an API and a scoped token, with llms.txt and OpenAPI so an LLM can operate it end to end.